Building a Better List: US Bulge Shermans

With shipments of US reinforcements being delivered around the world, I felt that now is a good time to delve into the US Sherman (Late) options.  As always with this series of articles, I start with a health warning.  Firstly the aim here is to look at the most competitive build of these formations and secondly this comes with a strong dose of opinion.  The great thing about FOW is that there is no perfect list and while I hope these ideas will give you an edge, people will immediately see a counter (and so the Meta dance continues).

Sherman Formations

The Bulge comes with two versions of the Sherman formation.  The basic has the stats below across it’s core units;

The “veteran” version comes with a wider force diagram with the inclusion of Pershings and a Super Pershing.  It’s core units have these stats;

The key thing here is that the veteran formation is cautious, and this is a huge deal in FOW, where an old saying is the ‘the best armour is not getting hit‘, therefore a 4+ to hit is a huge advantage.   The second difference is that the Vets get yankee ingenuity giving them a 3+ tactics (big for blitz and shoot and scoot) whereas the basic formation gets blood and guts for a 3+ last stand.  Frankly I will take the tactics buff any day.  The issue with the last stand roll is that you have already suffered a lot of casualties to get there and this is even more likely to happen with aggressive tanks.  The 3+ tactics can be useful in any turn.

In basic terms five Sherman (Late) is the same cost as four Veteran Sherman (Lates).  Interestingly the upgrades to the units are the same cost.  This places the aggressive list, statically at a big disadvantage.  For instance, a 76mm Jumbo is 87.5% the cost of a Veteran one.  However a straight 75mm (Late) Sherman is 80% the cost of a Veteran Sherman (Late).  Mathematically the more you add options to the Bulge Shermans the worse they are in terms of points vs their Veteran brothers.

Therefore my conclusion has to be that Veteran Shermans are optimal for a competitive build.  That said, let’s throw another option into the mix, the 3rd “Spearhead” Armoured Division (3AD).

Original US 3rd Armored Division - Epic Militaria

The 3AD is a command card applied to the Veteran Shermans which makes them reluctant (with a 4+ remount due to protected ammo). 
With a saving of 3 points per Sherman (Late) platoon and 2pts per Chaffee, Stuart or 105mm Sherman platoon and 1pt for everything else, this allows you to squeeze a lot more into your list.  Reluctant is a problem though.  You still have a respectable remount and last stand is always dicey, however you are now making them quite poor in assault.  I would argue that my expensive Shermans don’t really want to assault Panzerfaust packing Germans and there are other tools that can help that.

So, lets compare  platoon composed of 76mm Veteran Sherman Late and a Jumbo 76mm, all equipped with HVAP, in the three forms:

Sherman (Late) Platoon = 24pts
Veteran Sherman (Late) Platoon  = 28pts
3AD Veteran Sherman (Late) Platoon = 25pts.

For a 11% reduction in points vs the basic Vets, I become reluctant but perhaps saving as much as 12pts in a formation.  I really like that, therefore my second conclusion is that 3AD is my go to competitive Sherman (Late) build.

George S.Patton Jr

George Patton - Death, WW2 & Military Career - Biography

Okay we all know him and we (US players) all love him.  There has been some confusion about this card online, therefore I will clarify a few things based on some stuff Phil has weighed in on & things people are getting confused about.

  1. Patton is a force card, he isn’t part of a formation (note that there is no formation key word).  Therefore he isn’t in a tank on the table, he can’t be killed and affects all formation HQs from your Bulge book.  I.e. if I take a Sherman and a Battle Weary Rifle formation both HQs get the 8 inch bubble.
  2. The 8 inch bubble special rule is separate and in addition to the 6 inch formation commander bubble (which does some different stuff).  I.e. your formation HQs can’t start causing re-rolls to remount out to 8″, only their normal 6″.
  3. The card says when the unit leader is within 8″ and LOS of their formation commander…. therefore support units don’t benefit.  While a formation commander as per the main rule book can affect support units with their 6″ command bubble, this is a separate rule.   Don’t confuse the 2+ rally/remount with the core HQ ability any force has.

Patton is perfect for the 3AD, the 2+ remount will really keep the units going and partially mitigates 1 of the 3 main drawbacks (remaining 2 are last stand and counter attack).  Also a re-roll for a reserve dice EVERY turn is a bargain and especially important with expensive upgraded Sherman units.

He is pretty much an auto include for me.

The lists

I am going to present two options for what I think are competitive 3AD builds.  Each does something a bit different and all have separate strengths and weaknesses.  There is one thing which is key to remember;  if you are going to take AT13 HVAP rounds always take an even number of 76mm guns or you are wasting points.  Also remember that the card doesn’t allow HQ units to have the upgrade (hoping to see this changed in LFTF).

List 1

3 AD
Sherman (late) 76mm x 2  – 12
Sherman (late) 76mm x 3, Jumbo 76mm x 1, HVAP x 2 = 25pts
Sherman (late) 76mm x 3, Jumbo 76mm x 1, HVAP x 2 = 25pts
Sherman M4 75mm x 2, Jumbo 76mm x 1, 1 x Sherman (Late) 76mm, and 1 x HVAP= 20pts
3 x armoured mortars – 2pts
Patton  – 4pts
3 x Priests – 8pts
Short M8 Greyhound Cav Recon Patrol – 3pts
Lucky – 1pt


This list is really pumping out the Jumbos with three 76mm ones on table.  By playing around with the third platoon, I could have got another into the HQ but I find they make less of an impact there. 

With this list you get 10 AT13 hulls with stabilisers plus 2 x AT12.  The two M4s are also useful for targeting anti tank guns or firing smoke.  I added the Priests instead of infantry because it negates all the anti infantry firepower the enemy possesses (mortars, HMG, etc).  I always find one platoon is too easy to take out.  However Priests have a veteran skill and FP3+ with Time On Target (TOT) meaning they can quickly dig out infantry and guns, plus a second smoke bombardments allows you to protect and screen your force.

As with all the Sherman lists you can’t be reckless; plan ahead and use cover.  Don’t be afraid to use blitz on a 3+, ROF2 AT13 is impressive.

The nemesis of this list is a defending infantry list with lots of guns and integrated AT. Mitigate that by choosing maneuverer as your battle stance.

List 2

3 AD
Sherman (late) 75mm x 2 – 10
Sherman (late) 76mm x 3, Jumbo 76mm x 1, HVAP x 2 = 25pts
Sherman (late) 76mm x 3, Jumbo 76mm x 1, HVAP x 2 = 25pts
5 x Chaffee – 17pts
3 x armoured mortars – 2pts
3 x Callopie M4 – 6pt
Patton  – 4pts
3 x  Priests – 8pts
Short M8 Greyhound Cav Recon Patrol – 3pts


There are two main changes here;  Firstly third platoon is now composed of five Chaffees to drive a more aggressive play style.  These light tanks packs a respectable punch with AT10 but they are very fast and can threaten most things, if not from the front then from the side.  They also have HE so they can start engaging guns while their bigger brothers engage the heavies.  Secondly you get three Callopies.  They are downgraded to FA6 (if someone is shooting them with something above AT7 then I have bigger issues!) for the saving of 1pt and 3AD drops them further to 6pts.  That makes them an interesting choice; while only FP5+ a salvo template can stop infantry moving across ground in their tracks and it is a great area denial tool when it starts ranged in.  Do you really want to risk that platoon under the that template on the objective, and then get a TOT Priest on top, plus some mortars?  The draw back is the loss of the two 76mm guns from the HQ, however the 75mm is great for smoke and shooting guns.  Overall this will serve you better if your local scene is more infantry focused.

In summary

The Sherman formation is a varied beast with tons of options.  You will notice I haven’t touched the E8 and that is because I am already paying 25pts for 4 tanks and, while a 4″ semi auto blitz is nice, 1pt per hull is very expensive when it is largely situational.  Also you aren’t going to get everything you want.  I have gone without infantry favouring recce and artillery instead; others may think differently. 

Regardless, what is clear is that Veteran Shermans, when upgraded, are better value than their aggressive brothers and, for me, 3AD saves a lot of points (11pt in both lists).  In essence it bought me Priests and recce and I really think that is worth it.

24 thoughts on “Building a Better List: US Bulge Shermans

  1. Our local meta is a lot more infantry heavy and I’ve found that while the Sherman is amazing against enemy tank lists, it tends to struggle against enemy infantry and gunlines due to their lack of an assault tank. To help mitigate this I play maneuver which the Sherman is uniquely suited for with stabilizer and competitive pricing, like you pointed out. Even so, I find that much of the time an AOP and twin M7 batteries is particularly useful for not only the extreme spotting flexibility but also to help guarantee a first turn wipe on enemy dug in gun teams. Ranger platoons are also a great assault unit for a good price if you can support them properly with artillery and smoke. I’ve found that, if coordinated properly, I can remove a dug in enemy infantry platoon on an objective in 1-2 turns.
    I’ve also found aggressive Shermans to be pretty useful, especially with all the ways the US can overcome it with smoke and maneuver. This probably has something to do with my playing Soviets previously so aggressive isn’t as scary to me. I like that the trained shermans are essentially fearless, and the 3+ remount is stupendously useful, though I might be biased cause I’m used to the 2+ firepower in Team Yankee.
    I still need to try patton/3AD, but I’m personally a little skeptical since in maneuver games I often find my forces more spread out, limiting the usefulness of the 8″ bubble. My personal favorite is Abrams since he can essentially just replace your recon and give a platoon stormtrooper.
    I really like the E8s personally, probably because of how good they are at avoiding getting hit. I agree that they are situational, but I think my local group tends to err toward too much terrain, so they’re really useful here, especially with that 2+ cross check. I also just have a bias since its one of my favorite tanks of the war. I’ve never regretted a jumbo in the HQ, since I want my HQs up toward the front to help spot artillery and give rerolls. I normally go with a jumbo 75 and baseline M4A1 in my HQs
    I loved the article, great insights and stat crunch! Those are just some of my thoughts based on games I’ve played, sorry for the essay lol

    1. And I should specify, I know that Abrams is a veteran sherman only option. I’ve played both vets and non vets and I think both are very capable and even competitive! I just focused on nonvets since I tend to enjoy them more as an excuse to spam more tanks haha

      1. In Dday aggressive had its advantages but in Bulge if you want to upgrade them then they become worse for every single 76mm, jumbo etc you add.

    2. Thanks for the essay

      Good points and meta does differ in different areas.

      I have never found I need a OP or my Hq to spot for my arty.

  2. The rule in relation to support units and formation commanders say…”any formation commander may lead them, granting them re-rolls” So how is this being interpreted as not being their leader at that time and not qualifying for the benefits Paton brings ? At that particular time the formation commander becomes the support units formation commander.

    1. This was because the rule for formation HQ leaders (6 inch bubble) is separate (and in addition) to the 8 inch bubble that Patton brings and does different things. However since writing this LFTF has dropped callrifying various aspects of Patton

  3. Thanks for a great article, quick question would the bulge starter set be enough to build both lists? Or would I need additional units?

  4. Hey Mark,
    I’m trying to wrap my heap around your lists, but something isn’t right
    In this platoon from the first list:
    Sherman M4 75mm x 2, Jumbo 76mm x 1, Sherman (late) 76mm x 1, HVAP x 1 = 20pts
    My math is:
    20 pts for M4 sherman late platoon /4 tanks/
    + 3 pts/1xjumbo 76/
    +1 pts/1xsherman 76/
    +1 pts/1xHVAP/
    – 3 pts patton card

    So it’s 22, not 20 pts?
    Thanks in advance for clearing this up!

      1. The points are correct. 2 of the Sherman’s are M4s not M4A3 and therefore save 2pts.

  5. Hi Mark,
    I try to build the list in forces but I‘m confused with the maths and didn’t got it right.
    It would be nice if you can load up an pict of a forces list as example for dummies like me.
    Regards from Berlin,

    1. Chris, these articles were done before force had them uploaded. What is the issue?

      Have you remembered to downgrade some Sherman’s to the cheaper M4s?

      1. Hi! Really great article, huge fan of your website!! But trying to emulate list 1 (if I have to steal, I wanna steal from the best), I also think the math is not quite right; 3rd platoon with 2 75mm Shermans can’t be 5 points less then the platoon with 76mm-Shermans only. It is only 3 points less: -2 for two 76mm less and -1 for one HVAP card less. So the list is 102 points…

      2. Hi Mark, I’m very sorry but as Jan wrote, it is not possible to build that list one in forces for 100 pts. Of course, the 75mm M4s are cheaper but the sum is always 102 pts… !? Or do I make an other mistake?

          1. It‘s a pity that I can’t send you a picture of my list. So I think the confusion is about the third platoon. „2 x M4 Sherman 75mm“ and „downgrade“ means, that they are no veterans but the other two platoons are so? So if yes, whats about the other tanks of the third platoon? Are they veterans as well? If yes, is it possible to mix? Or is all that rubbish??
            Sorry for circumstances,
            Regards, Chris

        1. Sherman M4 75mm x 2, Jumbo 76mm x 1, 1 x Sherman (Late) 76mm, and 1 x HVAP= 20pts

          Start at 20

          Minus 2 for M4 = 18

          Add 76mm jumbo, 1 x 76mm and 1 x HVAP = 23

          -3 for 3AD = 20

  6. Hello,
    List 2 is Vet?
    How can you have an HQ for 11 and 3 x Callopie M4 – 6pt it should be 7?

    1. No that is correct. Read the article and it explains this is 3AD which reduces the price of units. Also the calliope on top of the 3AD reduction are M4s so save further points.

  7. Great article, albeit I’ve come to it late. Interesting to read your views on the E8, I had come to largely the same conclusion and, being fairly flush with Shermans, I was looking for any reasoning I may have missed to add them to an order. I like the idea of 2 x M4 76mm, 1 x Jumbo and 1 x M4 75mm in each platoon with 1 x Jumbo 75mm and 1 x M4 75mm in the HQ. If moving as a platoon I can see just a couple of E8s encouraging you to take chances and risk getting strung out. As such I decided to pass on the E8 order for now and opt for Jumbos and Hellcats 🙂

Comments are closed.